___________________
LOOOOONG LOAD OF SPEEL WARNING
___________________
QUOTE (ravein @ Jun 16 2003, 10:51 PM)
WAIT!!!!!!!! HIT THE BREAKS!!!!!!!!
okay...so...my last post made me think about something... and cultural segregation...these kids... chose not to have this prom with the black students not so much because there skin color was darker than theirs... but because they did not understand there culture.
Well try this on for size, a group of gay teens decide to throw there own private prom and not to invite straight kids... is it segregation or a environment that they feel safe in..and how does this outcome affect the original situation???
If the gay kids hold their own party and make an active choice that they will NOT invite anyone purely based on their sexual orientation then this is as prejudiced as if the only reason for not inviting people is the colour of their skin, or if the private prom said "no gays allowed".
On the flip side - If the active decision was not to invite hetrosexual kids who
wouldn't be able to cope in an environment where there were gay kids OR not to invite people
who are critical of homosexuality - then that is understandable (though lamentable).
Forming groups should be about getting together with people who share a common interest or goal or trait. It shouldn't be about excluding people who don't fit into your group - unless, perhaps, they are a threat.
Some groups should not exist - Nazis, Rascists, Paedophiles,
some cults... the list goes on (though I've only mentioned the couple that I am personally disgusted with).
When I was at Uni there were loads of societies - one for almost every social, ethnic, political or other group... eg - a gay and lesbian soiciety, a chinese society, african society etc, etc;
One day I got really drunk and bet a mate that I would be in more societies than he was by the end of the week. I then proceeded to attend every meeting of every society I could, explaining my reasons for joining. The one thing I remember was that the Rugby Society would only let me in if I completed the
initiation... I decided I wouldn't even ask what that entailed... The Gay and Lesbain Society welcomed me in, bought me drinks and gave me a discount card they'd each got to HMV. I was already in the African Society because of my Ghanian friends.
The fact that these groups had their clubs was for social reasons... it wasn't about exclusion, but inclusion... I didn't have to be gay or even bi to get into the gay and lesbian society. I'm not African. I'm not Chinese. I don't even own a mountain bike (the Mountain Bike society was one of the best).
These groups and all the others situations where Gays, Non-whites, or people of a specific religious or political or cultural persuasion meet up are generally not about keeping out white middle-class christian men. A straight person can walk into any of the gay bars that I've visited in London. I can go into the Lithuanian or Korean churches in West London and Kingston, I've visited the Central London Mosque (I needed to use a phone and two of the lads who helped keep the place clean gave me their phone cards), and our local Liberal Synagog (I like the Rabbi - hes a good bloke who does a lot for the homeless in my area).
There are minority groups who do not want outsiders to venture anywhere near them. Some do it out of fear of repression, which is understandable - but I would hope that this can be overcome through greater contact with other groups. Others segregate for less justifiable reasons - I feel these people are as blinkered as the people who try and exclude non whites, gays, people form lower classes, or non chiristians. Though there is an important distinction... no matter how rascist, sexist, homophobic or just unpleasant the minority group are - they're still just a minority. The effect of their prejudice is always going to be less than the effect that the majority
can have (which is White, middle class and Christian - where I come from). This is not to say that it is less disgusting - or less harmful - but that I don't think it's justification for the majority.