About time.
The World Bank and International Monetary Fund offered loans to so many of the world's poorest countries during the 60s and early 70s at
very low interest rates that most were succered in - only to see the WB and IMF raise the interest rates to severely crippling levels later on in the late 70s and throughout the 80s and 90s, so much so that these poor nations were only able to afford to pay the
interest on the loans and not the debt istelf - nor were they able to lower taxes (as some people have suggested they were doing), or spend money on those silly little things like health and education, or on public services like water and electricity, or on housing projects, or on job creation, or on areas like crime, law and order.
Personally I think that it is about damn time that this
crime is being brought to an end, most of the countries that are being targetted in this initiative have already repaid their initial debt many times over just on these artificially high interest rates.
I would also hope that these massive international financial bodies will also be more responsible in
whom they lend money to. In the past they have paid billions to support dictatorships where they knew and chose not to care that the money was being pocketed by corrupt and often oppressive regimes... all that mattered was that the country in question would be bound to making future payments - becoming a ready source of continuous income. Burma, Indonesia, Zaire (aka Democratic Republic of the Congo), Haiti, Liberia... the list (unfortunately) goes on. Perhaps this will stop.
I disagree with
Mata though. He
wasn't being cynical, he was being realistic in his apraisal of the situation. Paul Wolfowitz the new head of the WB has welcomed the G7 proposals saying that he hopes this will usher in a new era of free markets...
From the BBC website:
QUOTE
Mr Wolfowitz said he had a "new appreciation for the urgent need for debt relief", as well as "infrastructure and regional integration".
He also highlighted the topics of international trade policies and subsidies, and private sector investment "as key factors influencing prospects for the poor".
The US neo-con adgenda is to open up poor markets to US trade - something which many EU countries are pressing for as well, but neither the US nor the EU want to open
their own markets to African trade. Trade
from poor countries in Africa has been on a decline and is estimated to be worth much more than aid handouts from the rich West, but opening our borders to fair trade isn't yet on the political adgenda. And as China blossoms economically new sources of ultra cheap labour will be desperately sought after by sweatshop hungry US and EU based Transnationals.