QUOTE (Juiceisgood @ Jan 6 2004, 01:29 PM)
Didn't see it as i live in Australia.
Well, the right to hold beliefs cannot be a pick and mix affair, as for the children, well they have the right to bring their children up however they want to as long as they don't harm them. I don't condone racial hate, when I read that post I was sick to my stomach. But it's their right, and I feel rights are by far more important than anything else.
Fair enough
Juiceisgood, it's quite clear that we were all sickened by what has been described - and I agree that changing what people think is a very dangerous path to take - but what happens when it's a trade off between
rights... and I ask this as a question, not as a statement on anyone's beliefs.
Who's
right is
more important?
The right of the Nazi to kill or attack a person he doesn't like (eg - a Jew) OR the right for the Jew to live... (fairly straightforward question - with a fairly straightforward answer - The right to life is far more important. If the question is about destroying personal property, such as smashing in shop or house windows or desecrating cemeteries - we should have police protection for our belongings as well, correct? There are a great many Racists who
believe very strongly that they
must kill people such as non-whites, jews or even socialists.)
The right of the Nazi to incite people to attack Jews OR the right of the Jewish community to live without fear of harm?(This is where it gets tricky - what is more important? Full freedom of speech - where anyone can say
absolutely anything? Or a system where you can say what you like so long as it doesn't cause unnecessary harm, where we are
limited in what we can actually say? - What about the local leader of the KKK who incites his followers to burn down a church in Louisiana when there are still men, women and children inside... should he escape punishment because his
right to free speech is sacred? There are racisits who actively go out looking to spread their good word and get others to attack people... they believe that this is their calling in life.)
and on a similar note:
The right of the Nazi to scream verbal abuse at someone OR the right for people to go about their daily lives without being verbally abused.(How about the Protestant extremist who, with his mates from the pub, stands by the gates of a Catholic girl's primary school and scream anti-catholic abuse at girls as young as 4 years old, the abuse is pure race hate and includes threats to kill... should they be allowed to stand there and do this to young girls, or should they be arrested? These people have argued that all they are doing is talking, and that it is their God-given right to do so... they believe in what they are saying, so are their rights more important than anything else?)
_____________
It is very easy to hide behind the virtuous principal of
freedom freedom of speech, freedom of thought, freedom of association... these are all great things. I certainly enjoy being able to type this very post here on the matazone forum, I'm not going to get shot for accessing the internet and typing what I believe in (whereas I could be shot in some repressive regimes). So I truely enjoy my freedom of speech... but not at
any cost.
I am willing to sacrifice some of my freedom in order to live in a safe society. A society where I know that it is illegal for someone to murder me. Where it is illegal for someone to spread lies about me. Where it is illegal for someone to incite others to harm me.
I am free from harm, because society has taken away some of
my freedoms. I am NOT free to kill people (unless it is in self-defence), I am NOT free to spread lies about people (we have defamation and slander laws) and I am NOT free to incite others to harm someone.
And as a final point - this isn't just about race / religious intollerance. Race hate isn't the only form of hate - hatred of women, or men, hatred of someone's sexuality, or even their disability are all forms of hate. Personally I feel the right to live freely should apply to everyone, and this right should override certain other rights every once in a while.